Fat over lean—a confusing concept in oil painting

Confusing Concepts in Oil Painting: Fat Over Lean

Fat over Lean… Thick Over Thin… Thick Over Lean… Whatever… It’s Time to Get Rid of It

Let’s toss out the concepts of “fat over lean” and for that matter “thick over thin” (or the confused “thick over lean”) while we are at it, and let’s consider the physical structure of the paint.

To help you to understand the properties of oil paint, it is helpful to understand the relation between the pigment and oil. One way to think about the relationship between pigment and binder is a brick wall. Every mason knows there is an ideal ratio of mortar to brick. Too much mortar and the wall is weak. Not enough mortar and the bricks fall apart.

The same relationship exists between the pigments and binder in dried paint. We call this relationship or ratio the pigment volume concentration or PVC. Pigment volume concentration (PVC) is the volume of pigment compared to the volume of all solids. If paint has a PVC of 30, than 30% of the total binder/pigment is pigment and 70% is binder solids.

The point at which there is just enough binder to wet pigment particles is called the critical pigment volume concentration (cPVC). For almost all colors this is between 45% and 55% PVC. Films with lower concentrations of pigment have more gloss but as the PVC increases they become increasingly matte. Films with high percentages of pigment are more permeable to moisture and susceptible to solvents. This is because with more pigment, there is less binder to fill the voids between pigment particles. This porosity leaves the film open to the environment. Films with higher pigmentation have increasingly lower tensile strength. (See the graph.)

Fat over lean—a confusing concept in oil painting
Graphical display of how paint properties are affected by the volume of pigment concentration.
How pigment volume concentration effects paint properties.

As the PVC increases past the cPVC, the dried paint film will contain voids. The porosity will increase, moisture vapor transmission will increase, wet hiding will decrease, but dry hiding will increase. As the paint dries, a condition will exist where the paint has too much pigment and too little oil such that the internal voids created will entrap air or solvent in the vapor phase.

Most paint in tubes contain enough binder to wet and envelope pigment particles and so are at about the critical pigment volume concentration or cPVC for that pigment or mixture of pigments. The variation in the pigment volume of particular colors between brands are due to the type of oil used, the amount of oil (some paint makers may choose to make their colors softer or thicker) and the amount of additives used in their formulation.

Want to read the full article and unlock all resources? Choose an option below:

Already a member? Log in to continue Start 14-Day Trial ($1)
Cancel anytime · 30-day money-back guarantee

Related Articles

Responses

Leave a Reply to Marit

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Cancel reply

  1. George, why do you say that paint diluted with solvent is higher PVC?
    As far as I can tell, unless the solvent allows the oil to soak into an under-painting, leaving paint on the surface with a higher PVC, the pigment/binder proportion should remain much the same after the solvent has evaporated. I imagine any evaporating volatile components in the oil would be insignificant as far as PVC is concerned.

    (I’m seeking clarification because you are being quoted as saying adding solvent increases PVC at the facebook “Traditional Painting” group.)

    Thanks in advance.
    Ron Francis.

    1. The solvent does not directly increase the pigment volume concentration (PVC) of pigments but significantly decreases the viscosity of the oil in the paint film. Since oil paint dries rather slowly, this allows the oil to migrate into the substrate below (unless the substrate is non-absorbent), thereby depriving the paint film of oil and increasing the PVC.

  2. Hi George. May I ask, would there be any benefits to the end user by adding the cPVC percentage to paint tubes as a guide to how they have been formulated? For example, a student grade paint would have more fillers (likely) than an artist grade / colourman formulated paint would. Or does each tube regardless of its quality have a cPVC based on how that tube has been made?
    Secondarily, would this require a table of pigments/location of pigments used, to then base the cPVC on?

    Thanks. I’m just throwing thoughts out there, not an expert!

    1. There are no practical benefits to artists because what may surprise you is that almost all paints have the same cPVC from 45 to 55%. What does matter is the PVC of the paint. This changes based on the actual proportion of pigment to oil. This is something we have considered doing, and certainly we have most of the data already, as should most formulators.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

To begin reading the content, join thousands of artists enjoying our articles. Subscribe to receive updates on artists materials and practices.

Or Join as Member for More Benefits