White pigments do more than raise value. In tempera, they also shape opacity, surface feel, absorbency, and long-term change. Choosing the right egg tempera white is therefore a structural and aesthetic decision. This study asks a direct question: how do historic white tempera systems react in sulfur-dioxide-rich air? For today’s tempera painters, that is useful because egg tempera white passages often dominate grounds, flesh mixtures, highlights, and pale passages.
Rivas and coauthors tested fourteen tempera mock-ups made with one white pigment and one protein binder. The pigments were calcite, Bianco di San Giovanni (lime white), gypsum, and lead white. The binders were egg yolk and rabbit skin glue. The team then exposed the samples to accelerated sulfur-dioxide aging and tracked color, gloss, reflectance, roughness, mineral changes, and surface deposits (Rivas et al. 2025, pp. 3–6).
The main lesson is not that one white is always best. Instead, each white followed its own reaction path. Meanwhile, binder choice still mattered. In these white systems, binder choice affected visible change and surface texture more than it affected the total amount of sulfur salts formed (Rivas et al. 2025, pp. 15–17).
Why Egg Tempera White Choice Matters to Artists
Egg tempera painters often choose whites for handling and appearance. However, this paper shows that white choice is also a conservation choice. That matters most for works kept in cities, shown in old buildings, or stored where moisture and polluted air can collect.
The paper is also useful because the tested whites are not chemically alike. Calcite and Bianco di San Giovanni are carbonate-rich whites. Gypsum is a sulfate white. Lead white is a basic lead carbonate white. They may all look white in use. However, they do not age in the same way when sulfur pollution is present (Rivas et al. 2025, pp. 3–4, 10–11).
For egg tempera, that point is important. Egg tempera films are thin and lean. Therefore, small changes in roughness or reflectance can change how flesh, light, and soft scumbles read to the eye.
Thank you, excellent information
Hi George,
Thanks for finding and sharing a study on egg tempera, given they are relatively uncommon. The info is interesting, for sure; and you’ve distilled it clearly, helpfully. But, sigh, what a disappointment the authors didn’t include titanium white in their study. Nearly every tempera painter I know, including many iconographers, use titanium white. Is the conservation community aware of the contemporary tempera community? Or do they think of ET only in terms of the 1400s, as if it’s a dead medium? Anyhow, very puzzling to not include titanium.
George, can you identify the image used as the header? It’s beautiful – and shows one of the problems with whites in tempera; their tendency to form fine craquelure and bumpiness (as discussed in the article). The painting also look shiny, as if varnished. Do you know about that painting?
Thanks, as always. Koo
Thanks for the question, Koo. I look forward to reading the reply.
Fergus Ryan, Dublin